You are here

8.160 RICO—Conducting Affairs of Commercial Enterprise or Union

Printer-friendly version

8.160 RICO—CONDUCTING AFFAIRS OF COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE OR UNION (18 U.S.C. § 1962(c))

The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with having [conducted] [participated in the conduct of] the affairs of [specify enterprise or union] through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of Section 1962(c) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, the defendant was employed by or associated with [specify enterprise or union];

Second, the defendant [conducted] [participated, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of] the affairs of [specify enterprise or union] through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt. To conduct or participate means that the defendant had to be involved in the operation or management of the [specify enterprise or union]; and

Third, [specify enterprise or union] engaged in or its activities in some way affected commerce between one state and [an]other state[s], or the United States and a foreign country.

Comment

When racketeering acts are charged as separate counts in the indictment, use this instruction in combination with Instructions 8.155 (RICORacketeering ActCharged as Separate Count in Indictment) and 8.157 (RICOPattern of Racketeering Activity). When the racketeering acts are not charged as separate counts in the indictment, use this instruction in combination with Instructions 8.156 (RICORacketeering ActNot Charged as Separate Count in the Indictment) and 8.157 (RICOPattern of Racketeering Activity).

As defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1961(4), an enterprise "includes any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union"; therefore, the name of the legal entity should be used.

The enterprise cannot also be the RICO defendant when the charge is that the defendant violated 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c).

See United States v. Shryock, 342 F.3d 948, 985-86 (9th Cir.2003) (defining "conducts or participates" in the affairs of the enterprise).